Format
Scientific article
Publication Date
Published by / Citation
Tim McSweeney, Caitlin Hughes & Alison Ritter (2016): The impact of compliance with a compulsory model of drug diversion on treatment engagement and reoffending, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2016.1219695
Original Language

English

Country
United Kingdom
Keywords
heroin
cocaine
diversion
arrest referral
treatment entry
crime reduction
England
UK

Effectiveness Bank Analysis: Mandatory Assessment for Arrestees Does Not Cut Crime

Further evidence from England that the ‘Tough Choices’ schemes which force people arrested for certain offences to be tested for heroin or cocaine use and if positive to be assessed for treatment do not pay back in terms of treatment engagement or crime reduction.

The 'Tough Choices' Policy:

‘Tough Choices’ was the term used to describe pre-sentence options introduced by the 2005 Drugs Act – testing on arrest and required assessments by a suitably qualified drugs worker.

Under the Act, a drug test is required to be administered in custody following the arrest of an adult for a ‘trigger’ offence (mainly linked to theft, drugs and fraud). Senior police officers may also authorise testing after any alleged offence suspected to have been contributed to by heroin or cocaine use. The test uses an oral fluid/saliva sample taken from the suspect to detect recent (up to 48 hours) use of the drugs. Read more...

Share the Knowledge: ISSUP members can post in the Knowledge Share – Sign in or become a member