Format
Scientific article
Publication Date
Published by / Citation
Rogeberg, o., International Journal of Drug Policy (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.019
Original Language

English

Themes
Keywords
Drug Policy
Multi-criterion decision analysis
MCDA
alcohol
cannabis

A New Approach to Formulating and Appraising Drug Policy

Abstract

Background

Drug policy, whether for legal or illegal substances, is a controversial field that encompasses many complex issues. Policies can have effects on a myriad of outcomes and stakeholders differ in the outcomes they consider and value, while relevant knowledge on policy effects is dispersed across multiple research disciplines making integrated judgements difficult.

Methods

Experts on drug harms, addiction, criminology and drug policy were invited to a decision conference to develop a multi-criterion decision analysis (MCDA) model for appraising alternative regulatory regimes. Participants collectively defined regulatory regimes and identified outcome criteria reflecting ethical and normative concerns. For cannabis and alcohol separately, participants evaluated each regulatory regime on each criterion and weighted the criteria to provide summary scores for comparing different regimes.

Results

Four generic regulatory regimes were defined: absolute prohibition, decriminalisation, state control and free market. Participants also identified 27 relevant criteria which were organised into seven thematically related clusters. State control was the preferred regime for both alcohol and cannabis. The ranking of the regimes was robust to variations in the criterion-specific weights.

Conclusion

The MCDA process allowed the participants to deconstruct complex drug policy issues into a set of simpler judgements that led to consensus about the results.

Share the Knowledge: ISSUP members can post in the Knowledge Share – Sign in or become a member