Initial stakeholder perceptions around opioid settlement funds in Pennsylvania

Background

The opioid epidemic continues to pose significant challenges in the United States, with over 75% of nearly 107,000 drug overdose deaths in 2022 involving opioids. Recently, efforts to curb the epidemic have made strides. Beginning in the early 2000s, local and state governments filed a series of lawsuits against opioid manufacturers and distributors. The lawsuits held that manufacturers and distributors knew about the potential addictive nature of these painkillers and withheld this information from providers, leading to overprescription and overdose. The current settlement funds allotted to Pennsylvania amount to approximately 2 billion USD, can be spent over the next 18 years, and are distributed at the county level. This paper investigates the early perceptions of local government officials and substance use service providers in Pennsylvania regarding the rollout of settlement funds and their decisions about how to use them.

Methods

This paper draws on 66 semi-structured interviews and 6 focus groups conducted in 2023 across six Pennsylvania counties. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and inductively coded using NVivo software.

Results

Findings reveal an initial sense of confusion among participants about navigating the funding process, exacerbated by unclear guidelines and insufficient support from state-level officials. Despite these challenges, participants express optimism about the potential for innovative, locally focused projects to effectively address the impacts of the epidemic. Emphasizing the importance of community involvement and transparency, the study highlights a collective commitment to ensuring that funds reach those most affected by the crisis. Yet still, some participants recognized the limits of the settlement funds in addressing the deep trauma that their communities have experienced.

Conclusions

The recommendations underscore the necessity for better systems to outline funding processes, promote best practices, and enhance inter-county collaboration. This research contributes valuable insights into the decision-making dynamics surrounding opioid settlement funds and lays the groundwork for future investigations into their long-term impacts and efficacy.